|
Hi
Gramps, |
Dear
Grams in ks,
Often
in our anxiety to do what is right and provide for our loved ones, we tend to
feel responsible for their behavior. Indeed we are responsible when they are
very young, but as they grow to adulthood they gradually assume more and more of
the responsibility for their own behavior. When they reach adulthood they are as
responsible for their own behavior as you feel that you are responsible for
yours. Their characters are pretty well formed. No doubt characters can and do
change, but seldom from the advice of others.
It
is sometimes impossible to please all parties with conflicting interests. What
then should we do? First, it would be well to let go, in the sense of feeling
responsible for their responses to our inputs. Next, in our interactions with
them, we must do what, in our judgment, is for their best good. If we do this
without responding with anger when put upon for our actions, but with a smile
and a soft answer, the example of our Christ-like behavior will preach the most
powerful sermons. Some may be alienated, but if we have behaved properly that is
their business. And if we demonstrate when we are treated poorly that we hold no
animosity and that we indeed have love and compassion for the person who
perceives us as being against them, they will have the best chance of coming to
an understanding of our motives and a desire for reconciliation. There is a
scripture that says,
"No
power or influence can or ought to be maintained by virtue of the priesthood,
only by persuasion, by long-suffering, by gentleness and meekness, and by love
unfeigned; by kindness, and pure knowledge, which shall greatly enlarge the soul
without hypocrisy, and without guile--" (D&C 121:41-42).
The
application of the principles of persuasion, long-suffering, gentleness, meekness,
love unfeigned and kindness represent the best ways of exerting power and
influence with or without the priesthood.
Gramps