Back Home Up Next

bullet

Gramps: My wife bought one of your books, and we have found it to be wonderful. My question to you is of deep importance to me, but it is very sensitive. It's about sexuality, and what is the church’s standing on this. Are fellatio and other forms of “Non-standard” sexual acts acceptable within the confines of a married couple’s bedroom? My parents say that it's “Sinful” and “the prophet has said so.” However my brother (a return missionary) say’s otherwise. What's your take? Second question: Pres Hinckley spoke against guys wearing ear rings in general conference a few years back. I want to follow the doctrine of the church, and the admonitions of the prophet, but when I heard his words, I heard them as suggestions, and his personal opinion. Again my parents say that I am wrong, and that his words are to be taken as law - and they have been harassing my son for his ear ring. My feelings (which where confirmed by the bishop’s 1st councilor) are that some things are said as suggestions, and others are said as law. What is your take? Sincerely, Echo

Dear Echo,

In the first place, I have never heard of the term “fellatio,” nor could I find it in my Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary. No matter: understanding that it must relate to some form of “non-standard” sexual act, I much prefer ignorance to knowledge. Further, its understanding is in no way necessary to address your questions. The Pharisees were chastised by the Lord for focusing on the literal interpretation rather than on the spirit of the law. True religion is not comprised of a catalogue of do’s and don’ts, but it consists of an attitude of righteousness. Relevant scriptures are–

As [a man] thinketh in his heart, so is he. (Prov. 23:7)

The LORD seeth not as man seeth; for man looketh on the outward appearance, but the LORD looketh on the heart. (1 Samuel 16:7)

It is the greatest folly to believe that one can have a lecherous heart and live out his prurient interests in the confines of his own bedroom, or vicariously in his own mind, and escape the wrath of God. The act of procreation was not designed to satisfy man’s animal interests but is one of the most sacred privileges granted by God to man, and is designed for the most holy of purposes. It should therefore be kept sacred and pure.

The General Authorities have spoken extensively on this subject. Let me quote just two references:

“All such deviations from normal, proper heterosexual relationships are not merely unnatural but wrong in the sight of God. Like adultery, incest, and bestiality they carried the death penalty under the Mosaic law.” (Spencer W. Kimball, The Miracle of Forgiveness.)

A priesthood holder is virtuous. Virtuous behavior implies that he has pure thoughts and clean actions. He will not lust in his heart, for to do so is to ‘deny the faith’ and to lose the Spirit. (D&C 42:23.) He will not commit adultery ‘nor do anything like unto it.’ (D&C 59:6) This means fornication, homosexual behavior, self-abuse, child molestation, or any other sexual perversion.” (Ezra Taft Benson, Come unto Christ)

In the Book of Mormon, Alma had this to say on the subject:

For our words will condemn us, yea, all our works will condemn us; we shall not be found spotless; and our thoughts will also condemn us; and in this awful state we shall not dare to look up to our God; and we would fain be glad if we could command the rocks and the mountains to fall upon us to hide us from his presence. (Alma 12:14.)

Now you judge if “Non-standard” sexual acts acceptable within the confines of a married couple’s bedroom.”

Let’s move on to your second question–

You seem to think that if the prophet of God were to some suggestion for our behavior there would be no moral obligation to follow that suggestion; and we would not be obligated to give it serious consideration unless it were in some way be canonized. This is another expression of the Pharisee concept. Do you really think that you can stand clean and acceptable before the Lord if you choose to follow the perverted practices of the world in direct opposition to the counsel from God’s chosen servant? Give me a break! We should be anxious to understand and to follow every word of the Prophet, rather than try to find how far we can wander into the realm of worldliness and self gratification and still somehow remain on the Lord’s side of the line. Here are a couple of scriptures that you might consider–

What I the Lord have spoken, I have spoken, and I excuse not myself; and though the heavens and the earth pass away, my word shall not pass away, but shall all be fulfilled, whether by mine own voice or by the voice of my servants, it is the same. (D&C 1:38)

And, behold, and lo, this is an ensample unto all those who were ordained unto this priesthood, whose mission is appointed unto them to go forth— And this is the ensample unto them, that they shall speak as they are moved upon by the Holy Ghost. And whatsoever they shall speak when moved upon by the Holy Ghost shall be scripture, shall be the will of the Lord, shall be the mind of the Lord, shall be the word of the Lord, shall be the voice of the Lord, and the power of God unto salvation. (D&C 68:2-4)

The Prophet has stated that boys should not wear ear rings and that girls should not wear more than one in each ear. Nothing more need be said.

—Gramps

Top of Page

Back Home Up Next