Back Home Up Next

bullet

Gramps, I return to you in the hope you may provide some answers to the questions I was not able to find answers for. So, if you have the time and resources, and I totally understand if you do not, here are some questions that I am hoping you will be able to solve not only for Ben but also for myself. Thanks. John

Dear John,

Concerning the questions you ask, most are unanswerable as they ask about the reasons for actions that would normally only be known only by the person committing them. But let me add my own suppositions in trying to answer the questions to the suppositions imposed by the questioner.

Gramps

1. Out of the 27 books of the New Testament, why do only Matthew and Luke mention the alleged virgin birth of Jesus?

Ans. Each author had a certain objective in mind, and to repeat the birth account evidently did not concur with the type of thing he was trying to put across.

2. Why is the “Slaughter of the Innocents” by Herod not mentioned by any ancient historian—not even by Flavius Josephus who recorded the history of Herod and his family with stress upon the crimes they had committed?

Ans. Who knows why the contemporaries wrote what they did? The slaughter of the innocents could have been quite local, the order could have been carried out only superficially, it may not have been so noteworthy since in those days those in power had and made frequent life and death decisions. For instance, guards knew that if their prisoners were to escape they would normally be killed.

3. And why would Herod think he needed to commit such a heinous act, when both the star and the magi clearly pointed the way to the place of Jesus’ birth?

Ans. The pointing of the way by the star may have had much more to do with revelation than with a searchlight in the sky. Perhaps only the informed would be able to notice any difference in the heavens.

4. Why is there no independent record of this star the magi are said to have followed? Astronomers know that Halley’s comet appeared in 11 BC; there was a conjunction of Jupiter and Saturn in 7 BC; and Mars passed close to Earth in 6 BC.

Ans. As above, it may not have been as prominent a phenomenon as we have built it up to be in our minds over the centuries.

5. According to Matthew, this star turned south to go to Bethlehem upon reaching Jerusalem. How is this possible when all stars “move” from east to west?

Ans. The word “star” could have meant any light in the sky. One could imagine that an angel held a light before them for them to follow, and the nearest descriptive term would have been the word “star.”"

6. Matthew and Luke both portray the temptation in the wilderness as a dialogue between Jesus and Satan. Since there were no witnesses, who recorded this dialogue?

Ans. This statement makes the assumption that Jesus never told anyone of the event.

7. Since there were no Christians present at Jesus’ trial before the Sanhedrin, who recorded the event?

Ans. How do you know that there were no Christians present? Why would the trial only have been recorded by a Christian?

8. If Pontius Pilate was made to judge Jesus guilty of anti-Roman political unrest, why weren’t his followers also arrested—or at least questioned?

Ans. Pontius Pilate was not abstractly interpreting the law, but attempting to placate the Jews who were clamoring for the Savior’s death.

9. And why does Pilate—according to the gospel of John—run back and forth like an errand boy between the Jews outside his palace and Jesus inside? This would appear to be utterly inexplicable behavior for the imperious ruler of a Roman province.

Ans. The imperious ruler of a Roman province was not all that imperious. We must remember that we have only the very sketchiest of accounts of the momentous events of those days, and that we are almost completely ignorant of the actual social climate and political intrigues of that day. Those things cannot be judged according to our own experience of justice, morality and other social mores.

10. When Pilate and Jesus were alone, who recorded their conversations?

Ans. They both could have.

11. Mark, Matthew, and Luke claim the sun went dark for three hours upon the death of Jesus. Why does no non-Christian writer of the time mention such a remarkable and readily observable event? Astronomers do acknowledge that there was an eclipse of the sun on 24 November in 29 AD—during Tiberius’ reign. But if this is the darkening the gospels refer to, then they are wrong about the crucifixion occurring during the time of Passover.

Ans. The sun can be darkened by many means. It would not have to have been a world-wide phenomenon. As one possibility, the local cloud and dust cover could have been so thick as to completely block out the sun, and it could have been so localized that it would not have been experienced by any except those in the immediate vicinity.

12. Why, in all the writings of Paul, does he (1) describe Christ as the Messiah who died and was resurrected at some unspecified time and place in the past but does not connect him with Nazareth, Jerusalem, or Bethlehem; (2) never cite the authority of Jesus for any of his (Paul’s) ethical pronouncements; (3) never describe any of the miracles allegedly worked by Jesus; and (4) never mention the trial before Pilate? In short, does Paul know anything concrete about the “historical Jesus” of whom the evangelists wrote?

Ans. Those are the kind of questions that only Paul could answer.

13. In Mark 10:12 Jesus declares that if a woman divorces her husband and then remarries, she commits adultery. This is peculiar to say the least, since in Palestine at that time only men could obtain a divorce. It suggests that the author of Mark was not in Palestine during Jesus’ lifetime. That is, it suggests that the author of Mark was not an eyewitness to the events he recounts.

Ans. Another person asked this question not long ago. Here is my reply to that question.

The information given in Matthew 5:32 and 19:9 is extremely limited. Without knowledge of the laws and customs of the society of that time, and the covenant of marriage solemnized by the holy priesthood in the early church, it is impossible to make a judgment on the specifics of the verses in question.

This much we can say, however. The practices of the church in the time of the Savior's earthly ministry, and in the days of the restoration both came into being by revelation from God. If they are different from one another in any particular, they are both right and correct for the time and age in which they were revealed. It would be very hazardous to impose the same rules of conduct on two societies as disparate as the world ruled by the Romans in the time of Christ into which society the early church was required to exist and the society in which the church exists today. It appears that without more information on the subject, we must withhold judgment. Elder Bruce R. McConkie had the following to say on the subject:

"As here recorded, our Lord's teachings about marriage and divorce are fragmentary and incomplete. They can only be understood when considered in connection with the law of celestial marriage as such has been revealed anew in modern times. These same general principles governing eternal marriage were known to and understood by the disciples in Jesus' day and also, in part at least, by the Pharisees. But the accounts here preserved by both Matthew and Mark of the Master's discussion on marriage and divorce are so condensed and abbreviated that they do not give a clear picture of the problem. Modern scriptural exegetes need the same background and knowledge possessed by those who engaged in the original discussion" (Bruce R. McConkie, Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, Vol. 1, p 546).

14. During the “seven days” God gave Noah to collect examples of each species, did Noah voyage to Australia, South America, the Arctic, etc.? If not, how is it that today we have animals such as the koala, the kangaroo, the yak, the llama, etc.?

Ans. The flood occured in 2348 b.c. At that time the earth’s land mass was all in one piece. The earth was not divided until the days of Peleg. Peleg was born in 2247 b.c.—100 years after the flood, and he lived for 239 years.

So Noah didn’t go out and round up the animals like a cowboy. Under the influence of the Almighty, they came to him.

15. Genesis 7:20 states that the flood consisted of a “fifteen cubit” increase in the water level. Considering that a cubit represented 18-22 inches, that means that the water rose a maximum of 27.5 feet. How did such a small rise succeed in covering all the “high hills” and “mountains” with water?

Ans. Again, the flood occurred before the continents were divided. We have no idea of the topology of the earth before its division in the days of Peleg.  

16. Genesis 11:1 claims that some generations after Noah "the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech.” Where is the evidence for this?

Ans. What kind of evidence do you want? The tower of Babel was built not long after the deluge in about 2300 b.c. It predates the Phoenician, Egyptian, Chaldean and Greek cultures. Linguist trace the various languages back to about that time, but have no idea of the genesis of language.

17. Raising Lazarus from the dead (indeed, dead for four days) was perhaps Jesus’ most impressive miracle. Why is such a notable event recorded nowhere other than in the gospel of John?

Ans. Again, each writer had his own agendum.

18. Flavius Josephus makes note of John the Baptist but does not suggest any connection he might have had with Jesus. Paul does not even mention John the Baptist, even though Paul accepts baptism as part of Christian doctrine. Why not?

Ans. Again, each writer had his own agendum.

19. Why do the “apostolic fathers”—Clement, Ignatius, and Polycarp—seem to know nothing of Jesus as an historic figure who worked miracles?

Ans. The church organized at the time of the Savior almost immediately went into apostasy. Much of the writing of the New Testament authors was in chastising the members for their disobedience to gospel principles. All the Apostles except John were murdered. When they were gone, there were no more general authorities. After that time no new bishops could be authoritatively ordained. With the withdrawal of the Holy Spirit men were left to their own devices to interpret the scriptures, and the truth quickly disappeared. Clement was born about 150 a.d. Polycarp also lived in the second century. Ignatius was earlier. He died about 110 a.d. But they were all adherents of the apostate church. The very nature of Deity was the kernel of the controversy that resulted in the council of Nicea in 325 a.d. so it’s little wonder that the belief system of the apostolic fathers was so far from the truth.

20. Is not the cosmological argument for God—that there must exist some causeless “first cause” and that must be God since all other entities have an identifiable cause—clearly fallacious? That is, it assumes as a premise that “God” is a meaningful concept that includes the attribute of being “causeless”? The very issue is whether or not such a “causeless” creator exists.

Ans. It is foolish to try to deduce the existence of a Divinity. The realm of God so far transcends the farthest extension of the senses of man and their projection by the reasoning process that is a completely futile exercise, and bespeaks the ignorance and short sightedness of those who try. God lives in a Celestial environment—we in a Telestial environment. We have not the means in a Telestial environment to probe into the Celestial environment. The only way that we may gain any knowledge of God is by Him revealing Himself to us and particularly to His servants, the prophets.

Top of Page

Back Home Up Next